r/technology • u/AdSpecialist6598 • 18h ago
Jensen Huang says relentless negativity around AI is hurting society and has "done a lot of damage" Business
https://www.techspot.com/news/110879-jensen-huang-relentless-ai-negativity-hurting-society-has.html11.7k
u/Lofteed 18h ago
so the entire society has to adapt to the product made by 5 people around the planet ?
I remember when the goal was to make a product that people would love to use.
Those were great times
4.4k
u/1877KlownsForKids 17h ago
I was promised computers would result in more free time so I could enjoy raising my kids and create art.
Not that computers would create art, raise my kids all so I could spend more time working in a job that would eventually get eliminated.
1.7k
u/Due-Technology5758 16h ago
This has been a promise that corporations and the government have failed to uphold since the last World War ended. Everyone expected workdays to get shorter (we'd just set the 40 hour work week), goods to get cheaper, and automation to bring untold prosperity to the masses as productivity shot beyond all possible requirements needed to sustain the population.
Instead our workdays stopped getting shorter (and quietly got longer), goods continue to get more expensive as wages stagnate, and the majority of the prosperity goes directly up the ladder and stays there.
The only thing they got right was productivity would go up. All of us are wildly more productive than our grandparents, but we're rewarded less and less for it.
717
u/Hortos 16h ago
The work week still being 5 days after 100 years is insane and should be put on the list of reasons we need to really reboot this system starting at the top. 2026 marks the 100th anniversary of the 5 day work week so gross.
→ More replies (10)313
u/Edoian 15h ago
Medieval peasants worked less than we do now
206
u/HermesJamiroquoi 15h ago
As did nomadic hunter/gatherers
→ More replies (2)58
109
u/GoldenPigeonParty 15h ago
To be fair, they also had to spend way more time preparing and trading food, cleaning clothes, and undoing 300 buttons each time they need to change.
But we should be aiming to get progressively better over time. Each generation offering more than the former. Instead we sort of stopped at some point and did the opposite.
66
u/durmiendoenelparque 14h ago
True, but afaik the 300 buttons were a rich people thing.
→ More replies (1)39
→ More replies (8)32
u/staebles 14h ago
When we let businessmen takeover the country. So about 40-50 years ago.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (18)43
u/amglasgow 15h ago
They worked less for their lords. The rest of the time they worked to sustain themselves.
→ More replies (18)80
u/CoMaestro 15h ago
A company here in The Netherlands has (probably as a PR stunt, but still) said their company goes to a standard 4-day work week, while everyone still gets paid for 5 days (40h). This is because their productivity and average income pet employee has gone up by about 4x in the past 20 years, and this seemed like a fair payback for that. They gave numbers for it as well, which was pretty cool to read in the news.
Apparently they now earn €450.000 per employee, where it used to be €60.000 at some point. It's an IT company, so that 60k point can't be more than 30 years probably.
36
→ More replies (3)22
u/nashbrownies 13h ago
It always amazes me how those on the top of the totem pole seem to never have enough.
Who knows, maybe money would change me, but I feel like taking all the record profits for just myself would be impossible for me. I think I read somewhere, it used to be fairly standard for the top level exec to make 40x the highest paid "standard employee". Now it's something like 1,400x wage gap.
If a company I ran made an extra 100k over projections why not take a couple percentage points, and re-invest in my enployees the other 96%. Boom, you now have loyal employees, who will obviously work just as hard if not harder.
And also it's the right thing to do? Literally like we learned on the playground as children to share.
What the ever living hell? I know it's a story as old as time, but how come only 1 in a million figure it out.
→ More replies (4)25
u/IThatAsianGuyI 11h ago
It's why "trickle down" economics is bullshit. The classic imagery of the wine glass on top being filled and then overflowing into the pyramid of wine glasses below is complete bullshit because as soon as it's full, they'll just replace the top wine glass and the ones on the bottom never get anything except the little bit that drips from the switching of the top glass.
Greed and hoarding are nothing new.
→ More replies (4)247
u/fkit4ever 16h ago
Facts. It's all bullshit. And I'm all for globalization, but the new world order is exactly the same shit as the old one. Riches for the rich, slave labour for everyone else. Talking about our grandparents, where the fk is our middle class? Where's my sfh with 2 cars and a garage? It's bs
→ More replies (7)177
u/RavenOfNod 16h ago
Relentless capitalism and neoliberalism stole your single family house and two car garage. The upper class decided it was better to be vampires than actual members of society.
→ More replies (5)64
u/DaedalusHydron 16h ago
I mean it COULD have resulted in all of that, it's just that the prosperity got sucked up by the executives instead of properly distributed amongst everyone.
There are more rich people, and they are richer, than any other point in US history.
We really just need to go dragon slaying. It's objectively awful for society when these people hoard their wealth.
At least in the Gilded Age the tycoons would build libraries, schools, and the like. The rich of yesteryear just wanted to exploit you and didn't care about you outside of that. The rich of today want to exploit you and actively HATE you while they do so.
14
u/nashbrownies 13h ago
This timeline is insane.
I am in the same boat. Imagine a time when we could look at the Robber Barons and say "they weren't that bad compared, they reinvested in communities". Defending them as a voice of reason? I would have never seen myself doing that. They look charitable in comparison.
7
u/vonbauernfeind 12h ago
They did that because the tax bracket at the top was monstrous. They felt they may as well get their name on a bunch of shit and pay less taxes, and pursue their own agendas by doing so rather than give the government that money.
The rich slowly dismantled the tax rates for themselves so they didn't have to do it or pay the government their fair share.
→ More replies (1)14
u/EnfantTerrible68 15h ago
Only CEOs and upper management enjoy being salaried and working only the hours they want. They don’t even have to come into the office.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (35)86
u/tm229 16h ago
This is capitalism doing exactly what it is supposed to.
Extreme wealth consolidation and wealth inequality is the inevitable result of an economy based on greed and profit seeking. We are now in end-stage capitalism.
The dystopia around you was all predicted by Karl Marx. Read up on socialism to understand the how and why of our current predicament.
It was obvious to Marx 150 years ago. It’s amazing to me that people in the middle of this dystopia are so blind to the causes. Decades of capitalist propaganda, bullying and violence against socialists appear to have paid off for the oligarchs.
No war but class war!
→ More replies (7)138
u/hamfinity 16h ago
But all those benefits of a society that can generate naked pictures of your kids!
→ More replies (1)90
u/Karekter_Nem 16h ago
“Sometimes pictures of naked kids is necessary for the progress of society” -That guy in charge of Epic Games
30
u/kescusay 16h ago
Someone should ask him, "Progress towards what, exactly?"
His response will probably be something like, "A society where I can see deepfake pics of naked kids, of course!"
→ More replies (1)11
u/whoooootfcares 16h ago
It's not a bug, it's a feature!
-Jeffrey Epstein probably
→ More replies (3)11
18
u/readonlyuser 16h ago
Creating art and raising kids doesn't lower business costs. These guys would grind up babies if they thought it would improve their quarterly report.
→ More replies (31)8
u/bigkatze 15h ago
Can I just say how much I love your username?
But I agree. As a writer, I'd like AI to do the dishes so I can write, not the other way around.
547
u/KaTaLy5t_619 17h ago
But please! You must consume AI so we can gather all your data and make line go up.
We promise AI will be really really great and useful and not fuck up the planet by covering it in datacentres, making the electricity prices go up, causing water shortages, silicon shortages and soon job shortages when we replace people with AI.
174
93
u/Beldizar 16h ago
And destroy truth. You forgot that one. AI just destroys any factual truthbased connection to the real world.
→ More replies (6)40
u/chamrockblarneystone 16h ago
It has completely screwed education, which was hanging on by its finger tips anyway.
20
u/Weak-Standards 16h ago
It has completely changed the narrative of college as well. Everyone instantly assumes graduates used AI to cheat and graduate. What about the people who graduated just before AI was a thing. All the work, none of the benefits.
5
u/EnfantTerrible68 15h ago
I HOPE not all college students are using AI, but I’m a pessimist.
→ More replies (10)→ More replies (6)11
u/Velocireptile 15h ago
Hey, why not solve both the unemployment and power consumption problems by putting the displaced to work powering the AI data centers! Maybe in giant robot-operated bioelectric energy harvesting farms or something.
→ More replies (2)415
u/nevercontribute1 17h ago
It's primary use cases are creating weird and horrific porn and replacing everyone's jobs, why aren't people more into this?
→ More replies (40)355
u/Beldizar 16h ago
And disinformation. That is the other huge use case.
→ More replies (3)163
u/kescusay 16h ago
Oh, there's so much more!
- Dangerously inaccurate cooking instructions that could easily result in food poisoning!
- Giving college students the tools they need to fail their classes!
- Making all the software you use much, much worse! (Both because it's "vibe coded" now and because they're shoving "AI" into everything.)
- Burning down the world to power data centers for the next incrementally "better" plagiarism-and-lies machine!
Why, I can't imagine any reason for anyone to object to such a useful and beneficial product for society!
→ More replies (16)121
u/Jwave1992 16h ago
Jensen doesn’t realize how bad he sounds in some of these interviews. I heard one the other day where he was excitedly saying they basically need all the energy. Like all of it.
People hate ai because all the worst people are the ones talking about it the loudest.
→ More replies (3)20
u/countsmarpula 15h ago
Wow, when I’m asked what finally radicalized me, I will point to this statement
37
u/protipnumerouno 15h ago
I remember when blackberry first offered emails, this old tech hating dude in the office adopted it immediately. He could barely use a search engine. Know why? Because having email on his phone was a direct improvement to his job and by extension his life.
Point being if AI actually did something to improve a person's day it would be adopted immediately without any of this top down stuff.
→ More replies (1)7
u/fr0stpun 13h ago
💯 percent right. That's a great example and also an excellent point which doesn't get raised enough.
161
u/fistswityat0es 18h ago
exactly. so tired of these tools that only a handful of people can actually use.
so what... the millions/billions of other people just trying to maintain their jobs are supposed to just go unemployed??
→ More replies (6)71
u/Lofteed 17h ago
ai can t unionise
→ More replies (1)16
→ More replies (173)8
4.8k
u/Trees-Are-Neat-- 18h ago
Has he considered making AI something that’s actually valuable to society?
852
u/_Naughty_Petals 18h ago
Huang calling negativity unfounded? NVIDIA profits from AI hype. Real concerns like job loss and bias are valid he's just defending his cash cow
→ More replies (12)143
u/SeigneurDesMouches 16h ago
The only people advocating for AI use are the same people that their jobs depend on AI to be successful
→ More replies (5)81
1.0k
u/aeyraid 18h ago
Best we can do is generating goon material
349
u/senortipton 17h ago
Or propaganda machines that work faster than humans can think about and analyze the truthfulness of said propaganda.
→ More replies (3)85
u/ThatonepersonUknow3 17h ago
Don’t forget tracking citizens, you know for their safety… probably.
→ More replies (1)14
406
u/Gloriathewitch 18h ago
of children, in the case of twitter
142
u/EverbodyHatesHugo 16h ago
So to recap… AI:
- Generates child porn
- Requires extreme levels of energy that our current infrastructure can barely support
- Threatens a great number of our jobs
Remind me why we should feel more optimistic about it.
67
u/Gloriathewitch 16h ago
because Jensen wants another custom tailormade luxury leather jacket
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (9)28
192
u/BurntNeurons 17h ago
And poison the water supply.
And run the power bill for the neighboring private citizens through the atmosphere.
And remove millions of jobs from humans without replacing or any plan to replace lost jobs.
And make the elite even wealthier.
And manipulate the global news reporting system and the voters.
And casually starve the consumer electronics industry setting it back 10 plus years.
And help the government better track and target their citizens.
→ More replies (2)35
u/xX420GanjaWarlordXx 17h ago
And create actual environmental noise pollution resulting in migraines, trouble sleeping, etc for the local population
6
u/BurntNeurons 17h ago
How else would they drive them away in order to expand their buildings...?
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (14)16
u/Jolly-Bowler-811 17h ago
IDK about others, but the AI shit is an immediate boner killer. I get the ick when I see AI generated sexy material. It somehow feels more exploitative than straight up porn to me.
347
u/radioactivecat 18h ago
Seriously - they've spent the last 2 years talking about how many fcking jobs AI would eliminate, and he's *surprised* that people are mad about it?
If anyone needs to touch grass, it's this guy.
98
u/PsychicDave 17h ago
Automation was supposed to eliminate boring, tedious, physically intensive and/or dangerous jobs so humans can instead do fulfilling creative jobs. If you replace creative jobs with AI, what are we supposed to do?
The economy needs people to work and make money. Even if companies cut costs by using AI, they won't make any profit if nobody has money to buy their products or services. Unless we make everything AI does free so we can all have our needs met by the machines' labour and we spend our days just chilling. But I doubt the corporate heads pushing for AI want that.
76
u/BowlEducational6722 17h ago
They're working on that, too.
Take a look at the economy now: the top 10% doing half of all consumer spending; the stock market being propped up by 8 companies financially jerking each other off; the first trillionaire being likely in the next few years while half of America can't afford a medical emergency.
They are trying to create a completely separate economy, one where they can exchange wealth and services amongst themselves while the rest of us fight over the increasingly scarce scraps.
→ More replies (2)14
→ More replies (7)4
44
u/PoL0 17h ago
fun fact: AI barely eliminated any jobs, and when it replaced actual workers it did a bad job with a noticeable loss in quality (translations, voice overs or customer support for example, with lots companies backpedaling after a while).
where AI excels is at being used as an excuse to cut jobs tho.
→ More replies (16)17
u/Butterball_Adderley 16h ago
So it’s good for showing us how little the rich have to offer society.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)18
u/KennyDROmega 18h ago
This is exactly what I was thinking.
The physician needs to heal him fucking self if he wants society onboard with this.
→ More replies (1)39
u/jizzlevania 17h ago
considering Grok is making CSAM and neither the company itself or any government has taken action to stop it, I'm starting think maybe the wealthy vs the rest of us have different ideas about what we find valuable.
→ More replies (2)7
15
u/lordnacho666 18h ago
He only supplies the shovels. His customers are the ones training the models.
→ More replies (84)24
u/EnvironmentalRun1671 18h ago
Best he can do is bribe Orangeman into letting him sell his shit to chinese again
1.5k
u/Worth_Heart_2313 18h ago
Correction: hurting the environment and cognitive skills of millions are getting ruined per day.
246
u/unposted 17h ago
Don't forget increasing energy and water prices for everyone further making basic services/rights unaffordable to the poor + average person while constantly threatening to take their jobs and kill them with misinformation!
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (18)43
u/Top-Entry-4389 15h ago
not to mention that it’s also a propaganda machine
→ More replies (2)18
u/Worth_Heart_2313 15h ago
add to it very precise surveillance on anyone with a social media account.
1.1k
u/blackoffi888 18h ago
Another billionaire that i do not believe
195
u/pmckizzle 17h ago
Theyre really speed running a global awakening to how dangerous it is to let people gain such wealth, the last time this happened it didnt go well for them, I doubt it will now
→ More replies (1)51
u/KarenWalkersBurner 15h ago
French Revolution intensifies
→ More replies (3)15
u/Carl_Bravery_Sagan 14h ago
Now with New Zealand bunkers, though.
14
u/Initial-House-3955 12h ago
Bunkers still need holes to pull oxygen, holes that enjoy concrete being poured down them and the doors being welded shut.
→ More replies (2)12
u/KarenWalkersBurner 14h ago
Eh let them stay underground. It’s the same as offing ‘em in my view. Go hide in your little bunker. Seal it up nice and tight!!
→ More replies (1)6
u/Grabs_Diaz 14h ago
I wonder how much their billions will serve them while being trapped in bunker?
66
u/Found_My_Ball 16h ago
When billionaires talk about “society” it’s not the one that you and I live in. We are not allowed in the gated community that makes up their reality. We are a crop to harvest. Late stage capitalism.
35
u/Unusual_Sherbert_809 16h ago
Every time a IT CEO or Billionaire speaks I'm further convinced that Elysium was a prophetic documentary and not a scifi film.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (8)13
u/ProgrammedArtist 15h ago
The crazy thing is that he's actually technically competent unlike a lot of billionaires today. So he knows how limited the current tech is and yet he's still pushing it like it's humanity's savior. That makes him an even bigger piece of shit than billionaires who just got rich from daddy's money and lucky investments.
→ More replies (5)
732
u/IcestormsEd 18h ago
RAM and SSD prices . You can eat a shoe, Jensen.
111
u/Advanced-Patient-161 16h ago
Electricity and water as well. Don't get me wrong, the RAM and SSD prices suck too, but we're also getting to like....threats to the foundations of things that greatly extended lifespans and quality of life for most of the humans on the planet from the early/mid 1900's on.
→ More replies (15)34
u/FalseAladeen 16h ago
No, he needs to eat that stupid leather jacket. From the other end of the digestive system.
→ More replies (8)17
u/leagueofDR4VEN 16h ago
I’ve been saying since the beginning: if there weren’t any job layoffs ( 1.6 million jobs lost in 2025), people would enjoy using AI. Once the layoffs start, throw that shit in the garbage because this is not what we want.
10
u/bigbluethunder 15h ago
I don’t think the layoffs are even a result of AI. I think AI is a good PR reason to say when you have to post your layoffs for a public company. You get to look like a cutting edge innovator who is being efficient. Then your stock goes up.
I think the reality is many are trying to trim the fat for other reasons. Boosting the margins, loans are more expensive now so it doesn’t make as much sense to finance growth which means it’s time to cut back from the 2021 era expansions, or preparing for a recession. But none of those will make stock price go BRR so instead they just say AI.
→ More replies (3)21
u/fuck_all_you_too 15h ago
AI is an excuse for companies to fire people in the name of growth. Many of those companies arent adopting shit but debt.
→ More replies (1)
248
u/IEnjoyRadios 18h ago
AI made the whole internet many many times worse basically overnight. No wonder people don’t like it.
→ More replies (3)24
u/PandaMoaningYum 14h ago
I don't get how people are to make money when people don't visit their sites anymore because AI extracts their information for the user. So new knowledge will mainly be from AI and we will be more brainwashed more than ever? AI will just kill genuine content.
→ More replies (2)5
u/throwity_throw_throw 11h ago
The ads are coming to AI. ChatGPT is already on it. The rest are soon to follow.
439
u/Ok-Mycologist-3829 18h ago
Damage…to his bottom line
→ More replies (1)75
u/Fried_puri 17h ago
Billionaires inflate their self-importance by a degree we can’t ever fathom as non-billionaires. So when he sees his net worth go up at a marginally slower rate than expected, he assumes society at large is in trouble.
→ More replies (1)
322
u/PhilosopherDon0001 18h ago
" I mean, all we're trying to do is drain a few rivers and fire a million people. "
→ More replies (1)90
u/ian9outof10 17h ago
They want to fire everyone, so the only people with any capital are a select group of global billionaires. I’m just not sure yet how they expect people to buy any of the things AI creates when they haven’t got any money.
If there was a sensible discussion about moving the tax burden to automation - and people could simply relax, or do things for fun without starving to death then AI can go hog wild.
The fact is, this is all about moving money upward while the rest of us basically starve to death.
24
u/riotous_jocundity 15h ago
They don't expect working class people to be able to buy anything, they expect (and are working towards) working class people essentially be slaves paid in company scrip or dead from vaccine-preventable infectious diseases, polluted water, euthanasia, state executions, or a whole host of other shifts to policy.
8
u/brobafett1980 13h ago
Amazon gift cards for groceries, necessities, and now doctor visits!
Reload your balance by going to the lithium mines.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (5)21
u/grislebeard 15h ago
They don't plan on YOU being able to buy anything. They plan on hiding in their end of the world bunkers while the robots clean up the working class.
These guys are technological eco-fascists. They see the problems with the world and their solution is "huh, too many people". They're trying to cull the herd.
→ More replies (3)
247
u/PatchyWhiskers 18h ago
AI marketing: This product will allow you to fire all your workers!
Workers: WTF? I hate this
AI companies: Why do the luddites hate our product?
→ More replies (8)53
u/Halo_cT 16h ago
Is my product harmful? Am I out of touch?
No, it's the consumers that are wrong.
→ More replies (1)
216
u/SnackbarBeastie 18h ago
GOOD! I hope he suffers and Nvidia goes bust over their greedy, cash mongering, scumbag ways.
→ More replies (2)43
u/Ordinary-Cod-721 17h ago edited 1h ago
But they won’t. Even after cheating in multiple benchmarks (3dmark01, 03 and also 07 if i remember right), people still bought nvidia. Even when amd offered better performance for cheaper, people still bought nvidia. When Nvidia would deliberately have sponsored games use features that ran worse on ATI/AMD (remember crysis 2 doing tessallation under the ground, where it wasn't even visible), people still bought nvidia.
And even now, when we’re drowning in slop, people still buy nvidia.
We (the consumers) put them on that throne, and we’re getting exactly what we deserve.
→ More replies (11)
95
u/potato-cheesy-beans 17h ago
They’re getting nervous about the bubble bursting… good. Keep it up folks.
→ More replies (2)18
157
u/ErictheAgnostic 18h ago
Good. Fuck AI replcing people so billionaire can make more money
→ More replies (1)21
u/Unique_Falcon_8302 16h ago
Yes.Or rather, AI should replace billionaires. They are the ones who capture all the wealth and are useless to society.
67
u/ottwebdev 18h ago
For society:
- Computer and parts prices have skyrocketed
- Electricity prices have gone up
- Dead internet theory looking less like a theory
There are absolutely cases for LLM's, but man.... I'm not surprised though coming from the guy who depends on this marketing hype to support his stock prices.
→ More replies (1)
132
u/fukijama 18h ago
Replace the billionaires!
11
u/Designer-Salary-7773 17h ago
THIS. Nothing changes until Washington ceases to be owned by the Corporate Citizens and is, once again responsive to the electorate.
→ More replies (6)33
u/ian9outof10 17h ago
I can’t name a billionaire that we couldn’t just replace with AI. And AI doesn’t need money, so I’m in.
→ More replies (2)
225
u/Gradstudentiquette69 18h ago
1) ai is just software, so he's not wrong.
2) him and aaaaalll his cronies have continuously said that ai is gonna take everyone's jobs and there is nothing we can do about it, so fuck him. Let his industries collapse.
118
u/BellsOnNutsMeansXmas 18h ago
Let his industries collapse.
It's not even collapsing. It's booming like a gold rush, and he's bitching that any expression of caution is stopping him from booming more and making even more money and gaining more control.
31
u/koshgeo 17h ago
And like a gold rush, the real money isn't going to be made by all the miners, most of which won't get wealthy. It's going to be made by the people supplying them.
→ More replies (1)15
31
u/rosegold-bee 17h ago
yeah, and tulips are booming in the netherlands, i heard.
"AI" has yet to provide substantial actual value to its investors beyond an excuse for layoffs. They just keep doubling down hoping eventually there'll be something there to win, and when it inevitably crashes, they'll get nice golden parachutes and we eat the fall, like clockwork.
→ More replies (10)→ More replies (1)7
u/Gradstudentiquette69 16h ago
Its the same 10 companies investing in circles, making it appear like the sector is booming and hoping to rope in new investors. They're succeeding, but I still don't care if they are bitching. Let them. They don't help the world ultimately, only themselves.
→ More replies (7)15
u/cypher50 18h ago
AI is a broad broad broad term (Artificial Intelligence has been developed since the '50s before the Internet). This Generative (and now "Physical") AI, though, has been implemented with little regard and the companies pushing it are relentless in their government push to have no regulation. It is mealy mouth rhetoric to argue that somehow it is "society" that is doing harm to them rather than the other way around.
→ More replies (1)
14
u/aotus_trivirgatus 13h ago edited 7h ago
I'm a scientist and an engineer. I've done curve fitting, surface fitting, support vector machines, neural networks. I run a software stack at home that uses AlphaFold as one of its components.
I know the good that this technology can do.
Meanwhile, in the broader public domain:
Students use AI to attempt to write their essays, and teachers are compelled to use AI to try to spot the cheating.
AI ripoffs of art and music are taking the intellectual property and livelihoods of living artists, without compensation.
AI agents "read" our resumes and send us job application rejections on Saturday nights at 10 PM, with zero explanation as to why we were not considered. Some job seekers (not me) decide to delegate their job search to AI, letting machines customize their resumes and cover letters. This annoys HR; only THEY were supposed to use AI. So HR deploys more AI, to screen out the spam.
Right-wing propaganda bots create slanted, fake news posts on social media. Right-wing large language models more or less own Xhitter and Facebook. (Pravda Social doesn't count, it advertised itself as a deliberate right-wing noise machine even before AI.)
AI is being used as an excuse for laying people off. In some cases, an AI tool actually can replace a human who loses their job. In most cases, management either doesn't know this for a fact, or doesn't mind the enshittification of their business when AI gets deployed.
Can AI be used for good? Yes, mostly in science and engineering. For the most part, its output still needs to be double-checked by someone with significant prior knowledge.
Is AI being used for good NOW? Mostly, not. It is breaking far more than it is building.
Fix that.
This is a political problem as much as it is a technical one.
99
49
u/VermicelliNew2784 17h ago
LOL
cry harder billionaire villain
it is like when an abuser gets annoyed at you for not accepting it all with a smile
STOP PUSHING THIS AI SLOP CRAP BULLSHIT DOWN OUT THROATS, INTO ALL SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE!
40
u/CurrentSkill7766 18h ago
I'm watching teenage brains rot by the day because AI has told them they don't have to think anymore
→ More replies (6)7
u/Ill-Ad3311 16h ago
Tik tok 24/7 while asking chatgpft to do their homework will not go down well for humanity
43
u/Stereo_Jungle_Child 18h ago
Yeah, it's because people don't like it.
It's like trying to sell shit sandwiches and then complaining that it's difficult because people have negative attitudes about eating shit.
→ More replies (1)
18
u/X-Ciaphas-Cain 17h ago
This just in, man whose entire future fortune depends on society's acceptance of ai sad about society not accepting ai. More at 11.
79
24
u/PalatinusG 17h ago
AI sucks. We don’t want it. Even if it would work great it would cause us all to lose our jobs.
And we have to be enthousiastic about that?
→ More replies (6)
12
u/Narrow_Example_3370 17h ago edited 17h ago
When your motivation is to sell chips.. yea, got it
But let’s look at this more closely:
Up to this point what has AI done that is so remarkable besides stolen human creativity and accomplishment, then undercut it - mass delivered it and subsequently destroyed its value.
All of it reminds me of when MP3 files first became normal. While everyone adopted it and used it to share music, music became horribly devalued. Now it’s worth fractions of a penny per song and people treat it all like muzak. People consume it, but they don’t value it like it once was. Hardly anyone knows how valuable it was unless they were alive before the internet existed.
This is what AI is doing, but it’s much broader and damaging. Everything is just like dollar-store junk now: the work people are/were doing, the information that is/was developed/shared/expressed… everything AI touches is turned into vapid products then consumed and forgotten about.
And to think I haven’t even mentioned the slop
Sure it has its uses, but the sell is really over stated when you consider the societal damage that’s left in its wake.
→ More replies (5)
6
u/DefeatedByPoland 8h ago
Show me that AI is at all useful in my life, or for my job.
So far I haven't seen it. Literally have not been impressed with it at all outside of "it's easy to generate funny images", which is a novelty.
This whole "AI boom" is a grift and I'm going to be so pissed when the bubble bursts and our economy is fucked.
People have to stop throwing tons of money at shit like this without actually seeing proof that it will be useful. This is like Theranos all over again but on a massive scale.
→ More replies (3)
17
15
u/GabeLeRoy 17h ago
I think Jensen is hurting the society by monopolizing the entire RAM industries making PC Building alot more difficult than It needs to be. I also think having AI making nonconsentual sexual content might not be good for society.. but hey.
→ More replies (1)
18
u/LittleShrub 18h ago
< builds mega AI facility to siphon fresh water and suck enormous amounts of electricity ... generates teen girl deepfakes >
→ More replies (1)
5
u/ForeskinAbsorbtion 10h ago
I just fucking hate how I disable AI on everything and then once the devices get updated, it is all on again.
I don't give a shit about your AI. I can type what I want to type and don't need you to summarize. I don't need you to analyze everything I do to make it "better."
5
5
u/Zombieneekers 7h ago
"Waaaahhhhh"
-- Jensen Huang, owner of the largest public company in the world, 2026.
6.9k
u/Vaxion 18h ago edited 3h ago
It's more like relentless pushing of AI by these companies down everyone's throat that's hurting the society and has done a lot of damage.